Before investing in ChatGPT Ads, brands must first understand what users are actually asking AI platforms — because in the AI search era, prompt intelligence and GEO visibility matter more than ad spend alone.

Updated by
Updated on May 08, 2026
In the early hours of May 6, OpenAI once again dominated the headlines.
In addition to launching the new GPT-5.5 Instant model, the more significant announcement was this: the ChatGPT advertising platform officially opened self-service ad placement to all U.S. businesses. The entry threshold dropped from the previous $250,000 to $50,000. Any company can now directly register, top up their account, set budgets, upload creatives, and launch campaigns to reach ChatGPT’s 900 million weekly active users.
This news exploded across the marketing industry. Many brands had the same immediate reaction: finally, we can capture AI traffic — let’s start testing campaigns immediately! After all, ChatGPT’s CPM is reportedly as high as $60 (three times Meta’s), and that pricing itself sends a signal — this is a high-value, high-intent traffic channel.
But while everyone is discussing whether they should advertise on ChatGPT, we want to raise a more important question: do you actually know what users are asking inside ChatGPT?
This is not a rhetorical question. Because once you open the ChatGPT Ads dashboard, you will notice a feature called “Context Hints” — where you are required to input “target customer descriptions,” “specific question types,” “related prompts,” and “keywords” so the system can accurately target users.

In other words, ChatGPT Ads is not a traditional “bid-display-click” advertising model. It is an intent-matching system based on real user questions. If you do not know what users are asking, your ad campaigns are essentially blind firing.
And this is precisely the biggest blind spot most small and mid-sized brands currently face.
Before discussing whether brands should advertise on ChatGPT, we first need to understand the underlying logic behind ChatGPT Ads.
OpenAI has repeatedly emphasized one thing: the advertising module and the answer module are completely independent. Ads do not influence ChatGPT’s answers, and advertisers cannot pay to alter the AI’s recommendation results. If a user asks, “What is the best BI tool?”, ChatGPT will generate an answer based on its training data and real-time retrieval systems, while advertisements only appear below the answer and are labeled as “Sponsored.”
At first glance, this design appears fair. But it reveals a deeper business reality: in the era of AI search, traffic has been divided into two layers.
The first layer is the “answer layer” — brands directly mentioned, cited, or recommended by AI in its responses. These brands enjoy the highest level of trust and conversion because they are the result of AI’s “organic recommendation.”
The second layer is the “advertising layer” — sponsored content appearing below the answer. These brands must pay for exposure, and users naturally trust them less than brands appearing in the “answer layer.”
What does this mean?
Even if you run ChatGPT Ads, if your brand is absent from the AI’s actual answers, you are still at a competitive disadvantage. Users will see AI recommending competitors A, B, and C, while your brand D appears only in the ad slot. This disconnect — “AI didn’t recommend it, but the ad is pushing it” — directly impacts click-through rates and conversions.
More importantly, advertising requires continuous spending, while GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) is a long-term asset. Once you stop paying for ads, your exposure disappears. But if your brand enters the AI “answer layer” through high-quality content, that visibility continues generating compound returns over time.
So the launch of ChatGPT Ads does not signal “the end of GEO.” On the contrary, it reminds all brands that in the AI search era, you need to simultaneously compete in both the “answer layer” and the “advertising layer” — and the “answer layer” carries higher strategic priority.
Let’s return to the original question: do you know what users are actually asking in ChatGPT?
This is not an abstract strategic issue. It is a highly practical execution problem. Because the logic behind ChatGPT Ads requires you to already know:
If you cannot answer these questions, your ad campaigns face three fatal risks.
You may assume users ask “best CRM software,” but in reality, they ask “best CRM for a 50-person team” or “alternatives to Salesforce.” If your targeting is wrong, your ads will not be shown, and naturally, they will not generate clicks.
You may want to advertise around “enterprise BI tools,” but without realizing that Tableau, Power BI, and Looker have already secured the AI “answer layer” through extensive content strategies. Users see AI recommending those brands first, so even if your ad appears, the click-through rate will remain low.
Not every question deserves advertising budget. Some questions may have high search volume, but users are still in the early awareness stage, far from making purchasing decisions. If you allocate budget toward these “awareness-stage” questions, you will end up with high click costs and poor conversion rates.
All three risks point toward the same issue: you lack a “high-value question inventory.”
And this is exactly where Dageno AI provides its core value.
Let’s use a real example to demonstrate how serious this issue is.
Dageno AI previously released the “2026 Global BI Software AI Search Visibility (GEO) Benchmark Report.” In this report, we conducted 5,480 AI conversation tests across 20 leading BI software companies globally, covering ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Microsoft Copilot, systematically analyzing these brands’ visibility within AI search.
The data revealed a surprising fact: even an industry giant like Tableau has major “question blind spots.”
Within the rapidly growing topic of “AI-powered BI,” Tableau averaged only 6.9 mentions — significantly lower than ThoughtSpot (8.3) and Julius AI (7.2). More critically, for certain high-frequency questions such as “best AI analytics tools” and “AI dashboard recommendations,” Tableau’s visibility was highly inconsistent and sometimes entirely absent.
What does this mean?
If Tableau were to run ChatGPT Ads targeting “AI-powered BI” questions today, users would first see AI organically recommending AI-native tools such as Julius AI and Fabi.ai, while Tableau appears only in the ad section. This disconnect — “AI didn’t recommend it, but the ad is pushing it” — directly lowers click-through rates and conversions.
Furthermore, our data also revealed recommendation differences across LLM platforms. In Microsoft Copilot, Tableau’s average ranking hovered around fifth place because Copilot strongly favors the Microsoft ecosystem (Power BI, Microsoft Fabric). If Tableau wants effective ad performance within Copilot, it would need highly targeted “Tableau + Microsoft ecosystem” content strategies; otherwise, advertising efficiency would suffer significantly.
These insights come from Dageno AI’s systematic monitoring across 190+ global regions, 16 vertical scenarios, and thousands of real prompts. We are not guessing what users may ask — we are using real data to show exactly what users are asking, which questions have the highest search volume, where your brand is absent, and where competitors already dominate.
If the BI industry feels too distant from your business, let’s examine a more traditional industry example.
Dageno AI also released the “2026 GEO Status and Trend Research Report for the Crane Industry.” The crane industry is a classic B2B heavy industry sector characterized by long purchasing cycles, high technical barriers, and significant risk responsibility. Traditionally, customer acquisition in this sector relied on trade shows, distribution channels, and B2B marketplaces.
But in the AI search era, the rules are changing.
Our data shows that crane industry users are shifting away from broad questions like “which crane brand is best” and moving toward more specific, high-intent questions such as:
These are all high-intent, high-conversion “decision-stage” questions. Users asking these questions are no longer casually researching — they are actively seeking specific solutions and suppliers.
The problem is that most brands are not covering these high-value questions.
Our data shows that for “maintenance service” related topics, AI answers often cite third-party review websites, industry associations, and YouTube tutorial videos instead of brand websites. The reason is simple: most brand websites only provide product descriptions and lack content such as “how to choose a maintenance service provider,” “factors affecting maintenance costs,” or “regional maintenance provider comparisons.”
This is the “content gap.” And these gaps are precisely where ChatGPT Ads can perform best — because user intent is explicit and conversion potential is high.
But if you do not even know these questions exist, how would you know what ads to run? If you do not know the search volume behind these questions, how would you allocate budget? If you do not know competitors’ positioning around these questions, how would you build the right content and advertising strategies?
This is why every brand should conduct a “question asset audit” before investing in ChatGPT Ads.
Let’s return to the original question: what should small and mid-sized brands focus on right now?
The answer is not “immediately launch ChatGPT Ads.” The answer is “first identify your high-value question inventory.”
This is the core value of Dageno AI. We are not simply offering a “monitoring tool.” We are building a question asset management platform for the AI era.
Specifically, Dageno AI helps brands in three ways.
We are not guessing what users ask. We use real data to show exactly what users are asking, which questions generate the highest search volume, and which trends are growing fastest. This dataset covers seven major LLM platforms including ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Microsoft Copilot, and Gemini, ensuring you never miss critical traffic opportunities.
We show you which high-value questions your brand completely misses, which questions competitors already dominate within the “answer layer,” and which topics still have low-quality AI responses and obvious “content vacuums” that represent rapid growth opportunities.
Our upcoming feature will automatically recommend high-search-volume keywords and prompts based on your industry, products, and target markets. Instead of relying on guesswork and experimentation, the system will tell you exactly which questions deserve content optimization and which prompts are most suitable for ChatGPT Ads investment.

More importantly, this dataset serves two strategic purposes simultaneously.
The same “high-value question inventory” can be used for:
This is what we mean by “one dataset, two uses.” You do not need separate keyword research strategies for GEO and Ads. Instead, you use the same “question asset” framework to optimize both the “answer layer” and the “advertising layer.”
Ready to dominate AI search?
Get started - it's free! >Based on the analysis above, our recommendation for small and mid-sized brands is:
Do not rush into advertising. First understand what users are truly asking. Define your “question assets” using data rather than intuition.
Not every question deserves advertising budget, and not every question should become long-form content. Allocate resources according to question characteristics:
Do not treat GEO and Ads as isolated channels. Treat them as a unified strategic system. The stronger your visibility in the “answer layer,” the higher your ad click-through rates and the lower your CPC. Conversely, your advertising data can continuously improve your GEO strategy — prompts with the highest conversion rates should become priorities for content creation and optimization.
Finally, let’s take a broader view of how AI search competition may evolve.
We predict future AI traffic will form a “three-layer structure.”
Brands directly mentioned, cited, or recommended within AI responses. This layer enjoys the highest trust and conversion rates. It requires long-term content investment but generates compounding returns. This is Dageno AI’s core strategic territory.
Sponsored modules appearing below AI answers. This layer offers medium trust levels and works well for capturing explicit intent traffic, but it requires continuous spending — once you stop investing, visibility disappears. Ideal use cases include product launches, promotions, and competitor interception campaigns.
AI proactively recommending products within conversations, similar to “AI shopping assistants,” potentially using commission-based monetization models. This layer is still technically immature, but it represents the ultimate evolution of AI search — what many refer to as “agentic commerce.”
Within this three-layer structure, smart brands will invest simultaneously in both the first and second layers — using GEO to establish long-term visibility while using Ads to capture short-term conversions. Brands focusing only on advertising while ignoring content will see acquisition costs continuously rise because they will remain trapped competing solely within the “second layer” without access to the “first layer.”
More importantly, as ChatGPT Ads prepares to launch Conversion objectives (currently still grayed out in the interface), the advertising system will begin “learning” which prompts truly drive conversions. Brands without prompt intelligence foundations may suffer heavily from the platform’s “smart expansion” features — the system will automatically expand related prompts, but if those prompts lack precision, traffic quality will collapse and CPA will surge.
This is why Prompt Intelligence will become a core competitive advantage in the AI era. Just as keyword research defined the SEO era, brands will increasingly compete to discover “high-intent, low-competition” prompts. Dageno AI’s prompt search volume dataset will become a strategic asset.
The launch of ChatGPT Ads marks the beginning of the commercialization phase of the AI search era. This presents both a major opportunity and a major trap.
The opportunity is clear: this is an entirely new traffic channel, and early entrants can benefit from substantial “traffic dividends.”
The trap is equally clear: if you approach ChatGPT Ads with traditional advertising logic, performance will likely fall far below expectations — because you are missing the most important asset of all: question intelligence.
Do not use an old map to navigate a new world.
In the AI search era, the logic behind traffic allocation has changed. The dimensions of competition have changed. Your strategy must change as well.
Dageno AI has already helped hundreds of global brands and DTC companies transition from traditional SEO toward an AI-era GEO + SEO integrated strategy. We do not simply provide a tool — we provide a complete “data-to-strategy + agent-assisted execution” growth solution:
Dageno AI currently offers a 7-day free trial. You can directly experience prompt search volume data across 190+ global regions, identify your own “high-value question inventory,” and then decide whether to prioritize GEO, Ads, or both simultaneously.
Do not rush into ChatGPT Ads.
First understand what users are asking. Then decide how to spend your budget.
That is the correct way to operate in the AI era.

Updated by
Tim
Tim is the co-founder of Dageno and a serial AI SaaS entrepreneur, focused on data-driven growth systems. He has led multiple AI SaaS products from early concept to production, with hands-on experience across product strategy, data pipelines, and AI-powered search optimization. At Dageno, Tim works on building practical GEO and AI visibility solutions that help brands understand how generative models retrieve, rank, and cite information across modern search and discovery platforms.